By Dr. Yeo Lee Bak
| 1 | Question from Dr. Wan Azlina Binti Wan Ismail | Could simulated photos effectively capture the full essence of the relationship between humans and indoor plants, or is the true depth of this connection only realized through real-life experiences? How might the limitations of simulation impact our understanding of the benefits and complexities that come with nurturing indoor plants? | Answer from presenter | Thank for the question. Simulated model might be a more viable approach since it is designed under a controlled environment without external factors, for instance, visual elements. Our results also demonstrates differences for both actual and simulated model. The discrepancy between the actual and simulated model might be due to the variation of exterior views, which might infer the accuracy of the result. The actual view of the model shows that the indoor occupants can clearly see outdoor components, including the co-working space and a pink mounting board. Meanwhile, the simulated model exterior view is empty. This also has been highlighted by previous studied spatial layout and visual elements can significantly influence human emotions and behavioral intentions. In this case, the simulated model may provide a more reliable outcome to study the effectiveness of plants in stress reduction and restoration since it does not consider exterior views and factors. However, in reality, all the external factors are essential to reflect on because that is not something the indoor occupants can control, as executive management regulates the interior design of an office. Yes, definitely the real life interaction with plants provide greater benefits (can refer Han, 2017). There is study also suggested both real plants and the image of plants can induce feelings of comfort and relaxation. Nevertheless, real plants may provide better psychological benefits (Igarashi et al., 2015). Although our study provides valuable insights, it is essential to note that our sample size is relatively small. As a result, the regression coefficient in our mediation analysis may be affected. Therefore, we cannot draw conclusions based solely on the weight of the coefficient. In most cases, direct effect regression coefficients are higher than indirect effect coefficients, indicating that the attractiveness attribute may not be a mediator, except in the simulated model. In the future, we aim to investigate all attributes highlighted in the conceptual model and incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning to simulate indoor office environments. I hope I have answered your inquiries. Thank References: Han, K. T. (2017). Influence of passive versus active interaction with indoor plants on the restoration, behaviour and knowledge of students at a junior high school in Taiwan. Indoor and Built Environment, 0(0), 1–13. Igarashi M, Song C, Ikei H, Miyazaki Y. (2015). Effect of stimulation by foliage plant display images on prefrontal cortex activity: a comparison with stimulation using actual foliage plants. Journal of Neuroimaging, 25(1):127–130. |